K-Tec

AP: First detection of extra-solar terrestial sized planet?

  • Posts: 735
  • Thank you received: 113
Hi Phil,

I am going to use the 0.9m with an AP8p.

Alot of preparations to do yet. Going to be a long night!

Exposures may be over a 3.5 hour period (840) at 15 secs each.
This assumes the transit might start earlier than expected or later beyond the predicted times.

The longest period will be post processing the images.

Eamonn A
15 years 9 months ago #45576

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 638
  • Thank you received: 6
You've got a cracker of a night... at least it's a cracker here! Moonrise isn't until 23.10 and shouldn't be a problem until much later.

Best of luck!

Phil.
15 years 9 months ago #45586

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 735
  • Thank you received: 113
Present status of exoplanet 'b' of Gl 581. A predicted 86 minute transit event.

I managed to image Gl 581 last night.
230 images @ 20secs exposures with 12 second intervals.
Gl 581 was on my virtual horizon at an elevation of 15 degrees in Libra.
Started imaging before the event and about 45 mins after the event in case the transit predictions were inaccurate. This lasted about 2.5 hours of a sequence of 20 sec exposures. The last image was at 0200hrs UT.
The images came out well of Gl 581 and surrounding stars for comparison photometry.

I haven't had a chance yet to try photometric image processing. This will take a long time to process.

Eamonn A
15 years 8 months ago #45623

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 638
  • Thank you received: 6
Well done for grabbing it so low to the horizon. Let's hope there's some usable data hidden is some of the frames. Keep us posted.

Phil.
15 years 8 months ago #45624

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 735
  • Thank you received: 113
The detection of Gl 581 'b' and may be 'c' planet
transit would have established the absolute mass of the
planet and its radius. From these parameters one could
also determine the mean density of the planet 'b' and also
estimate its chemical composition.

Measurements of the light curves were taken between 22.40 hrs on May 4, 2007 and 0200 hrs on 5 May, 2007. The uncertainty on the estimated mid-transit times was 86 minutes.

GJ 581 has a V mag of 10.56 and was strategically
placed on the CCD to include a suitable comparison star
in the frames. As comparison I used the nearby star
BD-06 4172 (V mag of 10.50), located at a dis-
tance nearby. Anything as bright as 8 was avoided in case of descrepancies regarding the scintillation problem.

As check star I used a slighty fainter object (V = 12.2) located nearby.
I collected a total of 230 images with 20s exposure times
was monitored over 3 hours with an average interval
of 12 seconds for each exposure. Practice runs were tried out with other stars at the meridian. Exposure times were worked out with the right balance to avoid over blooming.

Photometric precision is therefore limited by scintillation and therefore I selected a long exposure to get over this problem at 20 seconds. This also avoided any blooming from brighter stars.
I used a programme that could achieve millimag accuracy of 0.001 in post processing for the 230 frames.

To determine whether or not a planet transit was present
in the data, it was important to have the estimated transit duration and
transit depth of GJ 581b. In turn an estimate of the
the radius of the planet, the radius of the star, the or-
bital separation between the two objects, and the orbital
period of the system. If it was an edge-on configuration (i = 90 deg) and a circular orbit, the transit duration could have lasted between 85 to 100 minutes. The data has shown no detectable transit despite obtaining millimag accuracy.

The observation therefore has ruled out transits of GJ581b
for very high inclinations. However, the star appears to
be more photometrically stable at short time scales than
at the time scale of months to years measured by Weis
(1994). Hence the 3.5 hours was sufficient for stability.
This is a process of elimination. Longer monitoring may be required in order to catch the transit as the planet may now be at a lower inclination.

Thanks Alastair for the references, data, etc and also to you Phil for clear sky report. I learnt alot from the whole process. In fact one IFAS member came down to my place to see the early images first results that were captured that morning. My whole weekend has been taken up with the post processing. I also was very lucky regarding the weather.

I hope to make another attempt on a future prediction.

Eamonn A
15 years 8 months ago #45634

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 38
  • Thank you received: 0

Replied by amckinstry on topic Nice report

Good Work, Eamonn.

Pity there was no visible transit, but it was a long shot. Perhaps
MOST will spot something.

Perhaps you should submit your report to www.transitsearch.org ?

www.ucolick.org/%7elaugh/

Regards
Alastair
Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist - Kenneth Boulding (Economist)
15 years 8 months ago #45659

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.065 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum