- Posts: 395
- Thank you received: 0
Somebody give this star a speeding ticket.
- bertthebudgie
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
16 years 3 months ago - 16 years 3 months ago #72447
by bertthebudgie
Eqipment
Lx90 8' SCT, UHC Narrowband filter
SPC900 Webcam, Atik 16ic
Astrozap Dew Heater
Meade eyepieces & barlows 9,26 and 32mm
Moonfish 32mm 2"
_______________________________________
"Always pass to the man in space"
Replied by bertthebudgie on topic Re:Somebody give this star a speeding ticket.
Wow what a find dg. I wonder would the difference in proper motion due to the fact that the dss image was taken in April and yours in August thus adding the Earths orbital movement to you calculation?.
I mean as it is a nearby star could it be the stars paralax you are measuring rather then its true proper motion. Means you need to take another image in 6 months to be sure:)
I mean as it is a nearby star could it be the stars paralax you are measuring rather then its true proper motion. Means you need to take another image in 6 months to be sure:)
Eqipment
Lx90 8' SCT, UHC Narrowband filter
SPC900 Webcam, Atik 16ic
Astrozap Dew Heater
Meade eyepieces & barlows 9,26 and 32mm
Moonfish 32mm 2"
_______________________________________
"Always pass to the man in space"
Last edit: 16 years 3 months ago by bertthebudgie.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JohnMurphy
- Offline
- Super Giant
16 years 3 months ago - 16 years 3 months ago #72483
by JohnMurphy
Clear Skies,
John Murphy
Irish Astronomical Society
Check out My Photos
Replied by JohnMurphy on topic Re:Somebody give this star a speeding ticket.
Nice result DG. Nice research Vagelis (say hi to Kiriakee for me, and of course all the gang - missing you all - hope to see you next June).
DeeBee - Parallax would affect all stars in the field thereby negating any differentiation. Think of it this way - there are many stars in the field, incl. galaxies with widely different distances from earth, yet they show no apparent movement. Unless the star in question is very close we should see no discrepancy
DeeBee - Parallax would affect all stars in the field thereby negating any differentiation. Think of it this way - there are many stars in the field, incl. galaxies with widely different distances from earth, yet they show no apparent movement. Unless the star in question is very close we should see no discrepancy
Clear Skies,
John Murphy
Irish Astronomical Society
Check out My Photos
Last edit: 16 years 3 months ago by JohnMurphy.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bertthebudgie
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 395
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 3 months ago #72497
by bertthebudgie
Eqipment
Lx90 8' SCT, UHC Narrowband filter
SPC900 Webcam, Atik 16ic
Astrozap Dew Heater
Meade eyepieces & barlows 9,26 and 32mm
Moonfish 32mm 2"
_______________________________________
"Always pass to the man in space"
Replied by bertthebudgie on topic Re:Somebody give this star a speeding ticket.
You are correct. But I understand that this star is very close to us.
Eqipment
Lx90 8' SCT, UHC Narrowband filter
SPC900 Webcam, Atik 16ic
Astrozap Dew Heater
Meade eyepieces & barlows 9,26 and 32mm
Moonfish 32mm 2"
_______________________________________
"Always pass to the man in space"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cobyrne
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 135
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 3 months ago #72568
by cobyrne
Replied by cobyrne on topic Re:Somebody give this star a speeding ticket.
Dave Grennan wrote:
Are you sure you did your calculations correctly? It looks to me as if the star is moving more in RA than it is in DEC. Did you remember to multiply your RA seconds by 15 to convert to arc seconds? That would have given you 576.3 mas/yr - 38% more than what simbad gives, but at least the right order of magnitude.I carried out an astrometric analysis and discovered the following
DeltaA (Diff in RA) = .73"
DeltaD (Diff in Dec) = 3.68"
This thus corresponds to;
PMRA = 38.42 mas/yr
PMDEC = 193.68 mas/yr
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cobyrne
- Offline
- Main Sequence
Less
More
- Posts: 135
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 3 months ago #72574
by cobyrne
Replied by cobyrne on topic Re:Somebody give this star a speeding ticket.
The parallax of the star is given in SIMBAD as 44.4 mas plus-or-minus 3.3 mas.
So it's distance from us is 1.0 / 0.0444 = 22.5 parsecs = 73.4 light years (plus-or-minus 5.5 light years).
So it's distance from us is 1.0 / 0.0444 = 22.5 parsecs = 73.4 light years (plus-or-minus 5.5 light years).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DaveGrennan
- Topic Author
- Offline
- IFAS Astronomer of the Year 2010
Less
More
- Posts: 2707
- Thank you received: 32
16 years 3 months ago #72576
by DaveGrennan
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Replied by DaveGrennan on topic Re:Somebody give this star a speeding ticket.
You are spot on Chris. Thats exactly what I did.
I had forgotten to convert it to angular degrees. The correct value should be therefore;
.73 * (15 * cos(41)) = .73 *11.3206 = 8.2641" which equates to a PMRA of 435mas/yr. This is much closer to the published value.
I had forgotten to convert it to angular degrees. The correct value should be therefore;
.73 * (15 * cos(41)) = .73 *11.3206 = 8.2641" which equates to a PMRA of 435mas/yr. This is much closer to the published value.
Regards and Clear Skies,
Dave.
J41 - Raheny Observatory.
www.webtreatz.com
Equipment List here
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.116 seconds